CONFRONTING THE POWERS THAT
BE
Jesus'
Answer to Domination
Session 5
...Almost every sentence Jesus uttered was an indictment of the
Domination System or the disclosure of an alternative to it. (TPTB)
Concern for the redress of a particular injustice needs to be seen
as part of a larger struggle against the Domination system in its entirety.
Social justice campaigns have been hampered by the shortsighted inability
to see that larger context. Consequently, the means they use often involve
domination. Or class or racial divisions are preserved within the social-change
movement. Or male supremacy is imposed by its leadership. Piecemeal efforts
for social betterment are often unrelated to each other. There is no larger
vision that fuses all such striving into a greater whole. (ETP 107)
Readings: ETP - Chapters 5 & 6; TPTB - Chapter 3;
Wink gives examples of the divine alternative to domination: the
ruler and teacher who serve, economic equality, nonviolence, the equality
of women, a new definition of purity and holiness, family as nurture rather
than control, law as subordinate to love, and a radically different understanding
of sacrificing the eyes of God.
Leadership: Jesus overthrew old forms of power insisting that those
who lead should be servants, humble. He acted out that role in the way
he led and taught and symbolized it by washing the disciples' feet.
Economic equality: People forget that besides the worship of other
gods, the main thing the great prophets of the Hebrew scriptures condemned
was the continually recurring disparities of wealth and poverty, the way
the rich gathered land and turned people into serfs or slaves. But we are
used to interpreting Jesus' teachings in the context of America's extreme
individualism and pietism. We have been taught to ignore the actions of
great power structures in our society--government, corporations, unions,
insurance companies and the like--which can devastate the lives of millions
with the stroke of a pen, and, instead, to concentrate on getting to heaven.
Nonviolence: It is equally difficult for us to hear Wink's exegesis
of Jesus' on nonviolence. In this one, we like to elevate Jesus to the
pedestal of absolute idealist who had charming teachings but is utterly
impractical in this kind of world. Wink points out how Jesus exposes the
deceptions of the Domination System, how it persuades people that violence
saves and violence is necessary, when most violence is related to protecting
property and wealth or attaining it. He writes:
A society with an unfair distribution of goods requires violence.
Violence is the only way some are able to deprive others of what is justly
theirs. Inequality between the rich and the poor can only be maintained
by violence. (TPTB 69)
Jesus lived and advocated a society, the Kingdom of God, which is peaceful
because it is just. This can only come about by adjusting means (nonviolence)
to the ends desired.
Women: We are only now discovering, with the help of women scholars,
how revolutionary Jesus' teachings about women and his treatment of them
were. He spoke to women in public; he touched them to heal, even a women
who was ceremonially unclean because of bleeding; he healed a crippled
woman in the midst of the synagogue, challenging male domination; he let
a woman of questionable repute touch him in public; and so on and on. Wink
says:
...in every encounter with women in the four gospels, Jesus violated
the customs of his time. Indeed, his approach to women had no parallel
in "civilized" societies since the rise of patriarchy over three thousand
years before his birth. (TPTB)
Purity and holiness: We are more comfortable with Jesus' teachings
in this area, the way he rejected the idea that holiness means separation
from the unclean. He ate with whom he pleased, he touched and healed by
touch whom he pleased.
In contrast to the traditional view that uncleanness was contagious,
Jesus regarded holiness/wholeness as contagious. The physician is not overcome
by those who are ill, but rather overcomes their illnesses. Thus Jesus
touches the leper, the unclean, women, the sick, without fear of contamination.
(ETP 117)
Family: Family in the ancient world was an instrument of social control.
Daughters were property and that ownership was passed on from father to
husband. Jesus, Wink notes, had little positive to say about family as
he saw it around him. Why?
I believe Jesus was so consistently disparaging because the family
in dominator societies is so deeply embedded in patriarchy, and serves
as the citadel of male supremacy, the chief inculcator of gender roles,
and a major inhibitor of change. It is in families where most women and
children are battered and abused, and where the majority of women are murdered.
(TPTB 76)
As always, Jesus offers a better alternative, a family made up solely
of all those who have rejected the domination of fathers and male rulers
and are prepared to live as equals in love.
Law: Paul saw that law, in principle, is good and necessary. In
practice, it is unjust and in the shackles of the Domination System. We
usually understand this in an individualistic way. But Wink notes:
Law is sucked into the contest for power; it becomes an instrument
of violence and a generator of violence, thus limiting its utility as a
means of reducing violence. (TPTB 79)
Sacrifice: Jesus' crucifixion ended the old sacrifice system for Christians
as the destruction of the Temple did also for Jews. But Wink sees a larger
significance of Jesus' death:
The powers had used their final sanction against Jesus and had failed
to silence him. Not even death could hold him. But if a mere Galilean artisan
has withstood the entire Domination System and has prevailed, then the
power of the Powers is not, after all, ultimate. There is another power
at work in the universe that, like water, cuts stone: nonviolent love.
(TPTB 80)
For Discussion
1. Pick out one interpretation Wink gives of a teaching of Jesus which
differs from what you were taught in your church. Lift it up for discussion
by the group. Are traditional teachings in our churches also tainted by
our own version of the Domination System? If so, in what way?
2. What does it mean when we are told that the American Christian heresy
is a radical individualistic interpretation of scripture? How does the
Domination System use individualism to blind us by ruling out discussion
of social issues in the churches?
3. The prophets often condemned accumulation of wealth with the impoverishment
of many, and judges who took bribes and ruled against poor people in favor
of the rich. Where do we see similar behavior in our society?
Copyright © 1998 by Vern
Rossman
[Prev | Top | Index
|
Next] Bridges-Across
the Divide